Monday, July 20, 2015

50 Summers Ago: Amazing Spider-Man Annual # 2

Fifty years ago comic book stores didn’t exist. Instead, you could saunter over to the neighborhood newsstand, candy store, luncheonette or various other establishments to purchase the latest comics. If you followed any of Marvel’s output, letters pages and house ads would have announced the upcoming Annuals which appeared every spring/summer, a time chosen specifically to coincide with children being off from school. The reasoning was that they'd have a few extra quarters to spend while taking a family vacation or sitting under a tree with a coke on a lazy afternoon.

In that long ago summer of 1965 Amazing Spider-Man Annual # 2  leaped off the racks, falling into the hands and back pockets of many a youth. 

The understated simplicity of Ditko’s cover included what would become an iconic Spider-Man image; the full-figure pose was used as the corner symbol on the monthly Amazing Spider-Man title years after he was gone. The bold coloring, likely by Stan Goldberg, compliments Ditko’s images. Spider-Man’s red/blue costume contrasts perfectly with the yellow background, purple logo and red/orange/white captions and corner box. Sam Rosen’s attractive lettering completes the picture.   

 In “The Wondrous Worlds of Dr. Strange!” Steve Ditko brought together two of his signature characters. Although this was a Ditko plotted tale (with Stan Lee dialogue and editing) it is possible the Annual may have been discussed months in advance, when Lee and Ditko were still communicating with each other (according to Ditko sometime before Amazing Spider-Man # 25 Lee stopped talking to him. To learn more about Ditko's side of the story I urge everyone to purchase The Four Page Series # 9, which can be ordered here):

Ditko has stated that he was against using guest stars, his contention being that it undercut the effectiveness and individuality of a superhero:

Everyone used from another hero’s story-world prevented us from focusing on, creating and developing our own unique story-world of characters and villains like Dr. Octopus, Electro, Kraven, etc. And it affected S-m’s own cast—JJJ, Betty, Flash, Aunt May—such as Johnny Storm’s (HT) relationship with Peter and his classmates, etc. All outside, other inclusions robbed us of our unique potentials.”

Steve Ditko, A Mini-History “Guest-Stars: Heroes and Villains”, The Comics, Vol 14, No. 7 July 2003 

Ditko avoided this problem by choosing not to use any of the supporting characters (even Spider-Man fails to appear in his civilian identity of Peter Parker) setting the tale apart from the monthly continuity. Ditko explained his reasoning, speaking specifically about the Annual in one of his essays:

“A line has to be drawn for what is acceptable and not acceptable for a character. (I even had magic limits on Dr. Strange. Amazing Spider-Man Annual # 2 (1965) featuring Dr. Strange, was, as an annual should be, a special event. It does not necessarily have to connect with the monthly adventures. And Spider-Man was already long undercut with space aliens.)” 

Steve Ditko, A Mini-History 1 “The Green Goblin”, The Comics Vol 12, No. 7, July 2001 

Ditko's compositional skills, cityscape and seedy characters come to life on this page. The vertical panel is particularly effective. 

 Spider-Man enters the wildly imaginative dimensions Ditko created in Dr. Strange. For you youngsters out there, there was a time you could ride a bus for 15 cents, but you had to have change - and Metro Cards didn't exist!

The plot centers on a sorcerer named Xandu, who seeks power by acquiring a magic wand, one half which is owned by Dr. Strange. Two dimwitted thugs fall under Xandu's spell and assist him in his quest (what better way to involve Spider-Man?). Despite the odd nature of the tale, Spider-Man remained in character, cracking jokes while being flung into another dimension (one of Lee’s best lines: "It's gonna take more than a 15 cent bus ride to get to Forest Hills in New York"). 

Dr. Strange discovers Spider-Man's presence during his mystic battle with Xandu in the last panel of page 15, building up the stories drama.   

 The more mature Dr. Strange leads the confrontation, with Spider-Man backing him up.   

Ditko set parameters. Throughout most of the story Spider-Man and Dr. Strange were unaware of each other, fighting on different fronts. The heroes did not “meet” until the final panel of page 15 and appeared in only 13 panels together. They combined forces against Xandu in the final confrontation, the older, wiser Dr. Strange leading the fray. This would make sense following Ditko’s logic of what makes a successful team, citing Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson.    

“The more the unequal status is perceived and valid, the better the results as a team operation” 

Steve Ditko, A Mini-History 6, Spider-Woman/Spider-Girl”, The Comics Vol  13, No. 5 May 2002 

Ditko's two unique heroes have a brief conversation before going their separate ways. The lettering on the word "friendship" is not by Sam Rosen, meaning the original word was replaced. Since this blog is titled "Marvel Mysteries and Comics Minutiae" I have to ask, what could it have replaced?

Ditko juggled the discordant elements of Spider-Man and Dr. Strange in a way that retained the integrity of both strips. Mood and color (likely supplied by Stan Goldberg), detailed buildings and arcane images, all combined to unusual effect. 

While not as expansive as the first Annual, where Ditko was given more pages to play with (41 as opposed to 20) this story was considerably more offbeat, and the brief interaction between Ditko’s heroes was memorable. It was the last time Ditko included a guest-star in his Spider-Man and Dr. Strange stories. 

Reprint of the splash page from Amazing Spider-Man # 1, March 1963. Lettering by John D'Agostino under the pen name "Johnny Dee". D'Agostino's career included work as artist, inker and colorist. D'Agostino lettered many of Ditko's stories for Charlton in the 1960s. Ditko's expressive hands showing emotion is at the forefront of this page. 

The "space aliens" Ditko referred to in the quote above was also reprinted in the Annual, originally presented in Amazing Spider-Man # 2, May 1963, "The Uncanny Threat of the Terrible Tinkerer!" Stan Lee plot and dialogue; Artie Simek letters. Although Ditko is correct that the sci-fi  elements, offshoots of Lee's Tales to Astonish and Journey into Mystery plots, are out of place in Spider-Man's world, the artist still invests energy and a quirky atmosphere to the yarn.   

While Ditko drew an exciting splash page (and included vignettes of Spider-Man's cast) Dr. Doom was too powerful a character to "realistically" confront a teenage hero. Characteristically for Ditko, Spider-Man doesn't defeat Doom; he flees when the Fantastic Four show up. Reprinted from Amazing Spider-Man # 5, October 1963.   

Amazing Spider-Man Annual # 2 had one drawback from the previous years effort; it (along with Marvel's other 1965 dated Annuals) included reprints in lieu of special features. A let-down, although to be fair a number of fans, yours truly included, did not own the original comics and greatly enjoyed seeing them. The 1964 Amazing Spider-Man Annual had 72 interior pages of all-new material (with only the inside front, inside back and back covers consisting of advertising);Annual 2 featured 70 pages of story and art (two house ads for the Marvel line and MMMS products were included). Either due to time constraints or cost cutting the opening 20 page tale was followed by reprints from Amazing Spider-Man #'s 1, 2 and  5. As good as Ditko’s earlier work is,his style grew considerably in a very short time;there is greater confidence in storytelling, composition and inking in his 1965 output.  

 Following in the footsteps of the first annual, the Gallery of Spider-Man’s Foes continued, including five full page pin-ups of Spider-Man’s rouges gallery up to the current period. Ditko’s mastery of pen and ink is evident in every line, and his clean, precise inking is a joy to behold.

While The Ringmaster was originally a Simon and Kirby villain, dating back to Captain America Comics #5 (August 1941), revised two decades later by Lee and Kirby in The Incredible Hulk #3 (September 1962), Ditko developed and created most of the rouges gallery, including the Clown and Princess Python, one of Ditko's more attractive females. Lettering by Sam Rosen.  


The Crime-Master was one of Ditko's non-powered criminals who fit perfectly into Spider-Man's world consisting of sinister gangsters, 
threatening back alleys and lonely docks. The two-part story in Amazing Spider-Man #'s 26-27 (July-August 1965) which also featured the malevolent Green Goblin, remains a true classic. Copy by Lee; lettering by Sam Rosen.

Amazing Spider-Man Annual# 2 was the last produced by Steve Ditko. In less than a year he would quit the company, never to draw his two signature characters again. The stories Ditko produced with Stan Lee in a four year period on Spider-Man and Dr. Strange are not just a nostalgic romp; many stand out as superior work woven by a master craftsman. It is an accomplishment that stands the test of time.  

The last caption in Amazing Spider-Man Annual #2 (reprinting Amazing Spider-Man #5) included new copy likely written by Stan Lee. One aspect of Ditko's work that is often ignored is his ability to create humorous situations. Peter Parker's bemused expression was one aspect of the character's personality that brought the character to life; a refreshing change from the cardboard heroes that permeated comics in that period.      


Vanguard said...

Very nice. Thank you.

Kid said...

Nick, I fear that, if Ditko had been allowed to do things purely his way, Spidey may not have been the success that he was. Ditko didn't even like the character being called 'Spidey', for crying out loud. And no guest-stars? Why not? The FF helped sell ASM #1, so an occasional guest-star certainly wouldn't have hurt sales. I can see why Stan Lee may have gotten exasperated with his collaborator's insistence on doing things his own way. In fact, it's a wonder they managed to produce the number of issues they did, given the circumstances. I think Stan had the right idea about doing things - the success of Marvel Comics at the time proves that, although, naturally, Kirby, Ditko, Heck, etc., were also instrumental in that success. Stan was the leader 'though.

I've got several printings of this tale, including the original ASM Annual #2 - it's an absolute belter. Now, pop over to my blog and identify the inker on the '60s Marvel posters. What do I pay you for? (Whaddya mean I don't? Oh well, that explains it then.)

pond said...

Nick, Greg Theakston did one of his Ditko reprint jobs a few years back that included a long interview with Ditko's studio-mate Eric Stanton, in which Stanton claimed that he and Ditko did a lot of assisting each other during the ~10 years they shared the studio space. Ditko is on record that Stanton came up with the idea of the web shooters in the creation of Spidey, for example, and there are many panels of Stanton's racy comics that sure as heck look like Ditko work.

Anyway, Stanton made the claim that he did a lot of the artwork on Spidey Annual 2. But he did not elaborate. I assume that Ditko plotted the story, so maybe Stanton inked some? Filled in background work? This is a fascinating question that alas will now probably never be answered for sure: just how much did Stanton contribute to the Spidey-Strange teaming?

Nick Caputo said...

Wallace Wood (where have I heard that name before? ) thanks for the kind words.

Stan Lee was out to promote the entire Marvel line and did a sensational job in that area. Growing up I loved guest-stars and crossovers, although some made more sense than others.

I can see both Lee and Ditko's point of view, and Ditko did go along with Lee for the most part, even if he did it his way (instead of working well together the two got in each others way. In issue 19 it was the police that nabbed Sandman).

When done with a little thought the use of guest-stars was entertaining and may have helped sales. It was also easier to accomplish with limited titles. In later years it became a mess. And what do we have now? Dozens of characters appearing in titles like Avengers every month with no regard for continuity or common sense.

Nick Caputo said...

As studio mates stanton and Ditko very likely helped each other out when deadlines loomed. I can see Ditko inking/lettering on some of Stanton's bondage strips, and suspect Stanton assisted with inking on some of Ditko's Spidey and Dr. Strange stories. Annual 2 may have had some inking from Stanton but I see an awful lot of Ditko in the story.
One correction. Ditko has never credited Stanton with the web shooter idea. In fact Ditko has said it was his idea. It may have been Stanton that made the claim.

Unknown said...

Thanks for the article. A friend of mine, when I lived in Georgia, got me very interested in reading and collecting Marvel Comics in the summer of 1965. I believe he started the year earlier. I bought Amazing Spider-Man Annual 2 that summer along with Fantastic Four Annual 3 and JIM(Thor)Annual # 1. These three comics remain some of my favorites to this day. I had read on the internet of this friend's passing a few years back and had always remembered him for being instrumental in my collecting of comics. I haven't read comics in years, but do have a complete Marvel Masterworks collection that I read continuously. Great memories.

Nick Caputo said...

David, I'm glad you enjoyed the post. The discussion on Annuals always seems to trigger fond memories for many, myself included. If you check my archives you will notice its a summer tradition on my blog to write about annuals; last year I wrote about ASM Annual 1 and a few others as well. Feel free to post your thoughts on them as well.

~D.Puck' said...

Amazing Spider-man Annual 2 will always remain a favorite of mine due to the use of both Ditko characters. I thought the reprints in that issue were interesting. The inking on the story from AS 2 was exceptionally fine, although #5 was one of my least liked of the first 10 issues I suppose due to it not having an original villian.

Nick Caputo said...


I agree on ASM #5 being the least interesting of the first 10 issues. While it had some good bits in places, Dr. Doom was out of place and too powerful to take on Spider-Man. It makes sense as an attempt to acquire additional sales, and may have brought in a few readers of the Fantastic Four comic, but story wise it did not have the punch of new characters such as Dr. Octopus, Sandman and the Lizard (although the Living Brain story was a also a little weak).

Obat Pendarahan Pasca Kuret said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Neil D Vokes said...

Spider-Man Annual #2 was always a favorite of mine-mainly because it had both of my favorite Ditko Marvel characters- years afterward I had the honor and pleasure of working on what could be considered a prequel to the annual's story- Kurt Busiek's Untold Tales of Spider-Man series contained stories that took place "in between" the regular series' original tales- he took that throwaway line of Spidey's in Annual #2,
"This is beginning to feel like old times" as an indication that Doc and Spidey had met before- he then wrote a story wherein they had an adventure battling Mordo,with a behind the scenes appearance by Dormammu- we did this as a 48 page special Untold Tales called "Strange Encounters" - it was-IS-a highlight of my 30 something year old career- I've been a very lucky bastard...;o)

Nick Caputo said...


Thanks for sharing your story. I've enjoyed your work greatly over the years.

Anonymous said...

I always thought 5 had one of the weakest endings of the original run. It should have ended with some verbal confrontation of some sort. This was just a weird way to end the story.

Hindimoviehd said...